Legal Opinion
Hadley v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 13, 1972No. Civ. 12235PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
By this application for a writ of mandate, petitioner seeks to compel the San Bernardino Superior Court to render and enter judgment in action number CW-4738 pending in respondent court, which itself was a special proceeding, namely, a petition for writ of administrative mandamus. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.)
Pértinent Facts
On January 20, 1969, petitioner filed in the court below a petition for writ of mandate to review actions of both the City of Ontario and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees Retirement System. The allegations of that petition may be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Steen v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Hadley v. City of OntarioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Karuk Tribe of Northern California v. California Regional Water Quality Control Bd., North Coast RegionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- In Re Marriage of BeilockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Prescod v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.