In Re Marriage of Beilock
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDANIEL, J. —
The ruling of the trial court here under review is an order granting a motion for a new trial. The “trial” which preceded the motion noted was not the type which usually precedes such motions. Following a judgment entered about five years earlier in a dissolution case, the wife obtained a writ of execution for claimed arrearages in both child and spousal support payments. After levy of the writ which caught $6,000, roughly half the amount specified on the face of the writ, the husband moved to quash the writ. His motion was granted, and then wife moved for a new trial.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Miller v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Berge v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Don v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.