Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Beilock

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1978No. Civ. 17869PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDANIEL, J. —

The ruling of the trial court here under review is an order granting a motion for a new trial. The “trial” which preceded the motion noted was not the type which usually precedes such motions. Following a judgment entered about five years earlier in a dissolution case, the wife obtained a writ of execution for claimed arrearages in both child and spousal support payments. After levy of the writ which caught $6,000, roughly half the amount specified on the face of the writ, the husband moved to quash the writ. His motion was granted, and then wife moved for a new trial.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Miller v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sanchez-Corea v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Kabran v. Sharp Memorial Hosp.California Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Berge v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Don v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API