Legal Opinion

Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Henson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1932No. Motion No. 10155; 1331—5842PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeddx, J.

On original hearing we reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause for another trial because said judgment erroneously required plaintiff in error to redeem in a lump sum settlement its liability for the weekly payments allowed by the jury for a period of 401 weeks. (See 48 S. W. (2d) 970.) We could not reform the judgment and award defendant in error the weekly payments found by the jury because his brief contained no waiver of his right to insist upon another trial that the plaintiff in error redeem its liability for the weekly payments in a lump sum.

In the motion now…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. ShookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HensonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wichita County v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Greathouse v. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Perdue v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. WilsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API