Maryland Casualty Co. v. Graham

(after stating the case as above).

The appellant complains of the submission of the issue of payment of the compensation in a lump sum because (1) the question as submitted improperly presented the issue, and (2) the evidence was insufficient to authorize an award therefor. It is pointed out in the ease of Norwich Union Indemnity Co. v. Wilson (Tex. Civ. App:) 17 S.W.(2d) 68, that the form of the issue should be such as to require the jury to find that manifest hardship and injury would result from the payment of the compensation from week to week at a definite sum fór a definite period. In…