Legal Opinion

Damore v. Winnebago Park Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 1, 1989No. 88-1741PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

This is a diversity action involving the construction of an exclusion clause in a homeowner’s insurance policy. The district court granted summary judgment to the insurance company, holding that the personal liability section of the policy did not provide coverage to the named insureds for bodily injuries sustained by the their son. We affirm.

I

American Family Mutual Insurance Co. (“American Family”) issued two homeowner’s policies to John and Barbara Da-more (the “named insureds”), one insuring the couple’s summer cottage on Lake Winnebago, Wisconsin, and the other…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. MacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. A.G. Ex Rel. Waite v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  5. Doern v. CrawfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Principal Casualty Insurance Co. v. BlairSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. Susan R. White & a. v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Company & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  3. Damore v. Winnebago Park AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API