Legal Opinion

Traynor v. McGilvray

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 17, 1921No. Civ. No. 3857PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This appeal is from a judgment based upon a verdict in favor of the defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff as the result of a collision between the automobiles of the respective parties which occurred on the afternoon of January 18, 1917, upon the state highway, between Burlingame and Millbrae, in San Mateo County.

The defendant was driving his car, a sedan, southward from San Francisco on his way to San Jose. The plaintiff was driving her car, also a sedan, northward from Burlingame on the way to San Francisco. A short distance ahead of her was a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hellman v. McWilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Scragg v. SalleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Bauhofer v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. In Re Estate of HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Lucy v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Larson v. SolbakkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Ritchey v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Schwarting v. OgramNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. FreemanUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Ungefug v. D'AMBROSIACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API