Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Huston

California Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1912No. Sac. No. 1992PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. L. G. Harrier, T. T. C. Gregory, and Theodore W. Chester, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal by the surviving executor named in the document offered for probate as the last will of deceased, and by Maggie Clark, a legatee named in said document, from an order denying probate of said document as the last will of deceased, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

Deceased died in the latter part of the year 1909, leaving an estate valued at about six thousand dollars. On December 1, 1905, when 86 years of age, she had executed the document offered for probate as her last will. By this document, after providing for burial and payment of her debts, she…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Estate of MotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Green v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Whitney v. TwomblyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. People v. ManoogianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Estate of SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Smith v. SpauldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Estate of CasarottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API