Legal Opinion
Stennis v. City of Santa Fe
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 22, 2008No. 29,997PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SERNA, Justice.
{1} On motions for rehearing, the opinion filed October 25, 2007, is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted in its place. The City of Santa Fe’s motion for rehearing is otherwise denied. Maria Stennis’s motion for rehearing is likewise denied. The Court, after considering the parties’ supplemental briefing, decides, as a matter of law, that the Section 3-53-l.l(E) requirement of obtaining a “permit” from the municipality was duly satisfied by the municipality’s 1999 Ordinance, which provided an application process through which the applicant must obtain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Smith v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Montgomery v. Lomos Altos, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Apodaca v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- NEW ENERGY ECONOMY, INC. v. ShoobridgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. SlaytonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- SWEPI, LP v. Mora CountyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- State v. VestNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
- Howse v. Roswell Independent School DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.