J. C. Felthouse & Co. v. Bresnahan
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover approximately seven thousand nine hundred dollars, with interest, alleged to be due on two notes given by defendants. Answering the complaint, execution of the notes was admitted; but by way of cross-complaint, it was alleged that the notes were renewal notes given as part of the purchase price of certain real estate; that the purchase of the real estate was made because of certain representations as to the character of the property which were false and untrue, and .that knowledge of the fraud had come to defendants within three years last past. Then…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Noyes v. ParsonsWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Davis v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Fruit v. FancherWashington Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ennis v. RingWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Dixon Et Ux v. Schoonover Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. City of North BonnevilleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Smith's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Rodin v. O'BEIRNCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.