Legal Opinion

Fruit v. Fancher

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1926No. 19510. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to recover upon a contract for the repurchase of certain property. From a judgment of the court rendered in defendants’, favor, this appeal is prosecuted.

In September, 1919, appellants and respondents entered into a contract for the exchange of their respective properties, the appellants transferring certain real and personal property in Okanogan county in consideration of the sum of $27,500, and the respondents paying therefor by the transfer of two hundred eighty acres of land in the Whitestone Irrigation district, of the value of $8,400, the balance being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State ex rel. American Freehold-Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dixon Et Ux v. Schoonover Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In Re Smith's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Stusser v. GottsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. J. C. Felthouse & Co. v. BresnahanWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Carlson v. OzmunIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API