Legal Opinion

Woodring v. Doyle

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1962No. Civ. 20173PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Appellant here challenges the probate court’s determination that she is not entitled to share in the distribution of the corpus of a trust established by her grandmother’s will. We do not believe that appellant’s previous appeal in another ease has foreclosed our consideration of the merits of her claim. Reaching the substantive issues, we conclude that appellant is entitled to share equally with her brothers and sisters, respondents in this ease, in the distribution of the corpus of the trust.

We describe the factual background which led to the present appeal. The testatrix, Mary E. Doyle,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stark v. CokerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Cason v. Glass Bottle Blowers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re Estate of HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. In Re Estate of MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bleeck v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Newman v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Estate of MinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Estate of CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Bank of Am. v. HodgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API