Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Henderson

California Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1911No. S.F. No. 5885PublishedCited by 49 opinions

APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of Humboldt County partially distributing the estate of a deceased person. Clifton H. Connick, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of partial distribution. J ames W. Henderson died on July 13,1910, leaving a will which was admitted to probate in the county of Humboldt. The will, which was holographic, was dated October 3, 1905. By its first and second paragraphs the testator declares his desire to save trouble to his wife and children and to deal justly and fairly by all for whom he makes provision, and appoints as executors his wife, Amelia J., his daughters, Ida H. Sevier and Alice J. Henderson, and his son, George Y. Henderson. Paragraph 3d, disposing of the estate, reads as follows:—-

3r…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. In Re the Estate of PeabodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Lambert's Lessee v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  4. Estate of HittellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Le Breton v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. McConnell v. DoolittleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Franck v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API