Legal Opinion

Bank of Am. v. Hodge

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1967No. Civ. No. 23606PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

John Page Sivell, Hugh Gordon Sivell, Verna Page Armstrong and Ernest Gamble Jr., who for convenience are designated as remaindermen, have appealed from an order entered in response to a testamentary trustee’s petition for instructions (see Prob. Code, §§ 1120, 1240). The order directs the trustee to distribute at the testatrix's daughter’s death that share of the trust estate held for her benefit, to Eleanor Ridenour Hodge and Nancy Ridenour Buchanan, referred to as the granddaughters.

The remaindermen contend that the trial court erred in finding that the decree of final distribution…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Radin v. Jewish National FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Estate of FlintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Estate of PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Estate of HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Estate of McCallenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API