Legal Opinion

Brady v. Oregon Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff has petitioned for a rehearing. In his petition he correctly avers that the action was brought under the Employers’ Liability Act of this state. See Chapter 3, General Laws of Oregon 1911, codified as Sections 6785-6791, Oregon Laws.

Plaintiff alleged that the defendant Lumber Company employed about 75 men. for the purpose of cutting sawlogs and transporting them to its sawmill, and that such employment constituted a hazardous occupation “within the purview of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the State of Oregon, being sections 6605 to 6695, both inclusive, of Oregon Laws.” The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Brady v. Oregon Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Birmingham Rolling Mill Co. v. RockholdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Whatley v. Zenida Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Woodward Iron Co. v. CurlSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Kaiser v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Gillilan v. Portland Crematorium Assn.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Kukacka v. RockOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API