Legal Opinion

Gillilan v. Portland Crematorium Assn.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1926PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELT, J. —

Defendant asserts there is no evidence of negligence and that its motion for a directed verdict should have been allowed. It is true there is no direct evidence as to what caused the marble shutter to fall, but this does not preclude recovery if, from all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the accident, a reasonable inference may be drawn that its falling was due to the failure of the defendant to exercise due care. The argument that there is no evidence the slab even fell does not impress us as worthy of much consideration in view of defendant’s allegations that the “child…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Barnowsky v. HelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hoag v. Washington-Oregon Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Mount v. WelshOregon Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Kaufman v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ritchie v. THOMASOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Lyons v. LichOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Goheen v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API