Legal Opinion

Pico Citizens Bank v. Tafco Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1962No. Civ. 25126PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

This is the second appeal in this case. Plaintiff as assignee of Moos Manufacturing Co. sought a judgment in replevin for the possession of a quantity of knife and scissor sharpeners or their value in the event of nondelivery (Code Civ. Proc., § 667). Plaintiff prevailed at the first trial, the judgment ordering defendant to pay damages in the sum of $2,000 as and for shortages in the quantities of sharpeners actually replevined prior to trial by claim and delivery. The judgment was thereafter reversed without further order or direction to the trial court (Pico Citizens Bank v. Tafco Inc.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Walker v. Harbor Business Blocks Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Ross v. Frank W. Dunne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Leiter v. HandelsmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Star Pacific Investments, Inc. v. Oro Hills Ranch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Thompson v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Palmquist v. PalmquistCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Flagship West, LLC v. Excel Realty Partners, L.P.District Court, E.D. California · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API