Legal Opinion
Palmquist v. Palmquist
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 25, 1963No. Civ. 20236, 20252, 20381, 20382PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Four appeals are consolidated on appeal. Defendant appeals from the judgments in two of the appeals respectively, and from the orders in the other two, all arising in the separate maintenance action hereinafter discussed.
Questions Presented
1. Appeal No. 20252. Is the Lercara judgment appealable ?
2. Appeal No. 20382. (a) Did plaintiff breach the 1960 agreement? (b) Is the McGee judgment valid?
3. Appeal No. 20381.' Is the award for plaintiff’s support valid ?
4. Appeals No. 20236, No. 20381, No. 20382. Are the attorneys’ fees awarded excessive ?
1. Appeal. No. 20252. The Lercara Judgment Is Not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Patton v. PattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Pope v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Jazz Pharm., Inc. v. Synchrony Grp., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Henry v. SharmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Applied Medical Corp. v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Applied Medical Corp. v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.