Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 22, 1927No. 17251PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY. J.
This is a second appeal between the parties concerning the same subject-matter. See Armstrong v. Coleman, 87 Okla. 288, 210 Pac. 1018, wherein this court said:
“Becky Armstrong is an old negro woman, illiterate * * * lived in a tent or hut in the woods. * * * Peter Coleman called at Becky Armstrong’s tent, carrying a club and wear- ' ing a six shooter and making threats * * * and there in the absence of her attorneys * * * prepared a dismissal. * * *”
The dismissal was toy this court held for naught. Here we have presented an appeal from the case on¡ its merits.
Becky Armstrong, née…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stevenson v. Saline CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Armstrong v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Armstrong v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taylor v. BrindleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Mayor of Baltimore v. PerticoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Trosper v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Galer Oil Co. v. PryorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Emerson v. YoungsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.