Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1927No. 17251PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY. J.

This is a second appeal between the parties concerning the same subject-matter. See Armstrong v. Coleman, 87 Okla. 288, 210 Pac. 1018, wherein this court said:

“Becky Armstrong is an old negro woman, illiterate * * * lived in a tent or hut in the woods. * * * Peter Coleman called at Becky Armstrong’s tent, carrying a club and wear- ' ing a six shooter and making threats * * * and there in the absence of her attorneys * * * prepared a dismissal. * * *”

The dismissal was toy this court held for naught. Here we have presented an appeal from the case on¡ its merits.

Becky Armstrong, née…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Saline CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Armstrong v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Armstrong v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. BrindleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. PerticoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  3. Trosper v. McKeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Galer Oil Co. v. PryorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Emerson v. YoungsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API