Legal Opinion

Trosper v. McKee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 3, 1931No. 20601PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

The parties to (his appeal are in the same relation as in the trial court and will be herein referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

The action is one for damages and the petition declares upon two causes of action. The first cause of action is for damages based upon certain alleged fraudulent misrepresentations of defendant in respect to the north boundary of certain lots located in Winans Highland Terrace addition to Oklahoma City, thereafter sold and conveyed by defendant to plaintiff.

The substance of plaintiff’s charge of fraud is that during the negotiations leading up to the sale…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Dale Tile Manufacturing Co. v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Dow v. WorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Miller v. WissertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Wyrick v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Crews Lumber Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Singer-Fleischaker Royalty Co. v. WhisenhuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. Detrick v. KitchensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. Superior Oil Corp. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API