Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1918No. 9458PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Washington County; R. B. Boone, Judge. Action by Minnie B. Armstrong against Prank Phillips and the Lewcinda Oil Company. Demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence sustained, and judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against the defendants in error, defendants below, for the purpose of recovering possession of certain real estate and canceling several instruments of writing which it was alleged clouded the title of the plaintiff.

Hereafter for convenience the parties will be called “plaintiff” and “defendants,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court. After the plaintiff had introduced her evidence and rested the court sustained a demurrer thereto and entered judgment for the defendant, so that the only error assigned for…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Walker v. Local Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Decker v. HickmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Coleman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Ware v. TyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API