Legal Opinion
Robinson v. District of Columbia Government
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2007-1796PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the District of Columbia’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Judgment on the Pleadings. The District of Columbia argues, inter alia, that plaintiffs claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 should be dismissed. Upon consideration of the motion, the response and reply thereto, the relevant case law, and the entire record, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in part. Specifically, the Court shall grant the motion insofar as it requests dismissal of plaintiffs Section 1983 claim. The Court will…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kenley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Singh v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Moore v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Westfahl v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Yancey v. St. Elizabeths HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013