Legal Opinion
Yancey v. St. Elizabeths Hospital
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 6, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2010-1953PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
This matter came before the Court on the defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By Order of September 30, 2013, the Court granted the defendants’ motion as to the plaintiffs sole federal law claim and dismissed the plaintiffs remaining claims without prejudice. This Opinion explains the reasoning underlying that Order. 1
I. BACKGROUND
For the purposes of this motion, the Court accepts as true all facts as alleged in the complaint. On or about May 21, 1989, Dr. Angela…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- John Doe I v. Exxon Mobil CorpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- McGinnis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Mike Zeyen v. Bonneville Joint DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Jiggetts v. CipulloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Mensah-Yawson v. RadenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.