Legal Opinion
Moore v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 5, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-0490PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is a motion for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, filed by the defendants, the District of Columbia and five officers of the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) 1 (collectively, “defendants”), on eight of the sixteen claims asserted by the plaintiffs, Angelique Moore and her son Eric Moore, arising from an incident with the police that occurred in April 2011. For the reasons set out below, this motion is granted in part and denied in part.
1. BACKGROUND
A. Factual…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Brenda J. Alcala v. Marriott International, Inc. and Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Quad Cities Courtyard by MarriottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Walter Blair, II v. DC & Thaddeus Modlin, Jr.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jackson v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ingram v. Shipman-MeyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Miner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.