Legal Opinion

Ochoa v. McCush

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1931No. Docket Nos. Sac. 4402, 4403PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Appeal from judgments for defendants in suits to compel the reconveyance of certain real property. The causes of action are identical, are submitted under one set of briefs and will be considered together; the word “appeal” will refer to both appeals.

The real basis of the appeal is • the contention that the findings do not support the judgment. The substance of these findings will therefore be set forth:

In 1916 plaintiffs and defendant S. A. McCush became owners, as tenants in common, of an undeveloped tract of land in northern Mendocino County of the reasonable value of $5,000, which they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Higgins v. EvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Pista v. ResetarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Krum v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Snodgrass v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ChurchDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1952

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API