Legal Opinion

Efird v. City of Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.

“A demurrer goes to tbe heart of a pleading and challenges tbe right of tbe pleader to maintain bis position in any view of tbe matter, admitting for tbe purpose tbe truth of tbe allegations of fact contained therein.” Meyer v. Fenner, 196 N. C., at p. 477; Winston-Salem v. Ashby, 194 N. C., at p. 390.

The material question presented on this appeal is set forth in defendant’s assignment of error: “That the confirmation of the assessment roll by the board of aldermen of the city of 'Winston-Salem precludes and bars the present contentions of the plaintiff as set out in the complaint, and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gunter v. Town of SanfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Brown v. Town of HillsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Garysburg Manufacturing Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Leak v. Town of WadesboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Vester v. Town of NashvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whiting Manufacturing Co. v. Carolina Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. In Re the Resolutions Passed by the City Council of the City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. City of High Point v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Crutchfield v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. R. R v. . AhoskieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API