Garysburg Manufacturing Co. v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ClaRíksoN, J.
Was the plaintiff mistaken in its remedy in proceeding under C. S., 7979, instead of under the method provided in chapter 102, section 12, Public Laws of North Carolina, 1925? We think so.
We think the law applicable to this controversy: section 12, chapter 102, Public Laws of 1925, pp. 215-16, in part, is as follows: “Provided, that if the State Board of Assessment or either of them is not satisfied with the appraisement and valuation so made and returned, they are hereby authorized and empowered to make a valuation thereof, based upon the facts contained in the report herein…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stanley v. Supervisors of AlbanySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- First National Bank of Greeley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Person v. . WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Missouri Ex Rel. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Caldwell Land & Lumber Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Committee on Grievances of the North Carolina State Bar Ass'n v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. . RobersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Bunn v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Distributing Corp. v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.