Legal Opinion

Vester v. Town of Nashville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdahs, J.

Tbe plaintiffs except to tbe judgment on these grounds: (1) Tbe description in tbe assessment roll is not sufficient; (2) tbe defendant failed to keep an assessment book; (3) tbe notice of sale is not sufficient; (4) tbe findings of fact are not supported by tbe evidence.

It is provided by statute tbat upon tbe completion of a local improvement tbe governing body of tbe city or town shall compute tbe total cost and make an assessment thereof, and for such purpose shall make out an assessment roll in which must be entered tbe names of tbe persons assessed, tbe amount assessed against them, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Schank v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Sanders v. Rocky Mount Insurance & Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Marion v. Town of Pilot MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Resolutions Passed by the City Council of the City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Efird v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. City of High Point v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. City of Salisbury v. AreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Arbogast v. . Buncombe CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API