Nebel v. Sulak
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J
1. Introduction
This appeal raises several questions of significance. First, to what extent may a disinterested third party observe a judgment debtor examination, and, *1366as a collateral issue, may a nonlawyer conduct a judgment debtor examination to enforce a small claims judgment?
We hold that a judgment debtor examination is a judicial proceeding open to the public. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 124 and 708.110, subd. (a).)1 Additionally, the examination must be conducted by a judicial officer or a member of the State Bar of California. (§ 708.140, subd. (b).) In the present case, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Schild v. RubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- H-CHH Associates v. Citizens for Representative GovernmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Schraer v. Berkeley Property Owners' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Paradise Hills Associates v. ProcelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Embarcadero Municipal Improvement District v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- EMID v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Jogani v. JoganiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Plys v. Ang (In re Ang)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2018
- People v. A.G.California Court of Appeal · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.