Legal Opinion
EMID v. County of Santa Barbara
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 25, 2001No. B141893PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
107 Cal.Rptr.2d 6 (2001)
88 Cal.App.4th 781
EMBARCADERO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. B141893.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Six.
April 25, 2001.
Review Denied August 15, 2001.
Goodwin & Associates, Robert E. Goodwin, Magda Lopez, Livermore, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Stephen Shane Stark, County Counsel, Alan L. Seltzer, Chief Deputy, for Defendant and Respondent County of Santa Barbara.
Hatch and Parent, Stanley M. Roden, Steven A. Amerikaner, Joseph D. Allen, John D. Bakker, Santa Barbara, for…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Carsten v. Psychology Examining CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Kaatz v. CITY OF SEASIDECalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- McLeod v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.