Legal Opinion

People v. A.G.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 2010No. D053991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

The People alleged in an amended petition that A.G., a minor, came within the juvenile court jurisdiction under Welfare and Institutions Code1 section 602 because she violated Vehicle Code sections 23136, subdivision (a), and 22349, subdivision (a), and the curfew provisions codified in San Diego Municipal Code section 58.0102. The court found true the allegations of the Vehicle Code section 22349, subdivision (a) violation, and the San Diego Municipal Code section 58.0102 violation, and found A.G. was a person described in sections 601 and 602. At the dispositional…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. WeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Stephan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. People v. SinohuiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sanchez v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. Jonathan T.California Court of Appeal · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Dep't of Conservation, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API