Hyde v. Wilde
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. S. J. Higgins, City Attorney, F. McCleneghan, Deputy City Attorney, M. R. Thorp and Paul S. Honberger for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiffs, alleging themselves to he duly qualified and registered voters within the municipal limits of the city of San Diego, brought this proceeding against the mayor and common council of said city to compel the council to either pass or submit at a special election a certain ordinance desired to be put into effect by the petitioners. A judgment for the issuance of a peremptory writ was made after hearing had, and defendants have appealed.
The proposed ordinance had to do with the matter of material to be used in street construction and surface work, and the material clause thereof is as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hopping v. Council of City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Chase v. KalberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Wiedwald v. DodsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Cole v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Hayes v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- State ex rel. Nelson v. ButlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Green Valley Landowners Ass'n v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Sutton v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Baum v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.