Legal Opinion

Whitehurst v. . Hinton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The former opinion, Whitehurst v. Hinton, supra, decided (1) that, as there is no evidence in the record that defendants, by fraud or undue influence, wrongfully procured the execution of the will of John L. Hinton, deceased, or that they had any knowledge or notice that the validity of said will would be attacked, the plaintiffs may not recover rents and profits for the period from the probate of the will to the date it was adjudged to be void; (2) that plaintiffs are entitled to recover rents and profits received by defendants after the invalidity of said will was adjudged; and (3) the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hogsed v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Johnson v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Maggett v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Gordan v. . Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Leroy v. . SalibaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Whitehurst v. HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Cox v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Hughes v. . OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Whitehurst v. HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API