Legal Opinion

Gordan v. . Gas Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 12, 1919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, J., dissenting; ALLEN, J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. This action was instituted against the Pintsch Gas Company in 1913 to recover damages for emptying sewage on the lot of the plaintiff in the town of Hamlet, N.C. Judgment by default and inquiry was taken at December Term, 1913, for want of an answer. At March Term, 1918, the inquiry was instituted, and the jury found, in response to the issue submitted: "What damages, if anything, is the plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendant in this action?" "$2,975." And thereupon judgment was entered for that sum.

On 26 June,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. . AllmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Sluder v. . RollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  3. Merritt Milling Co. v. FinlaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Asheville Division No. 15 v. . AstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. McCrea v. Starr.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1809

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hogsed v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Bailey v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Hughes v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Blue Ridge Electric Membership Corp. v. Grannis Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Lee v. . HoffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API