Whitehurst v. Hinton
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNbokne, J.
The assignments of error brought forward by appellants on this appeal are pivoted, in the main, upon the question as to whether defendants, other than Mrs. Alley, were parties to the.former action or proceeding of Whitehurst v. Hinton, 209 N.C. 392, 184 S.E. 66, in which the judgment of Devin, Judge presiding, was entered at June Term, 1934, of Superior Court of Pasquotank County. As to this it appears from the record in that action or proceeding that this very question was presented to the court, and decided adversely to the contention now made by appellants that they were not such parties.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murchison National Bank v. BroadhurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Whitehurst v. HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Brown v. . PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Whitehurst v. . HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Parham v. . HenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.