Cox v. Shaw
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
When the cause came on to be heard on exceptions filed, the court had authority to affirm, amend, modify, set aside, confirm in whole or in part, or disaffirm the report of the referee. Quevedo v. Deans, 234 N.C. 618, 68 S.E. 2d 275; Keith v. Silvia, 233 N.C. 328, 64 S.E. 2d 178; G.S. 1-194, 195. The order vacating the report of the referee and ordering a new survey was purely interlocutory. It affected no substantial right of the parties. G.S. 1-277. Appeal therefrom was fragmentary and premature. Whitehurst v. Hinton, 222 N.C. 85, 21 S.E. 2d 874.
We may note that the motion for a new survey…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Keith v. SilviaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Quevedo v. DeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Whitehurst v. . HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942