Legal Opinion

Transcontinental Fertilizer Co. v. Samsung Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 85-1106PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EDWIN E. NAYTHONS, United States Magistrate.

This case involves a controversy between plaintiff Transcontinental Fertilizer Company (“TFC”), a California corporation with its principal place of business in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and defendant Samsung Company (“Samsung”) a Korean corporation, with respect to the shipment of goods from Korea to Egypt. TFC has brought suit to recover damages allegedly suffered as a result of receiving defective bags pursuant to a contract with Samsung.

Presently before this Court is a motion filed by TFC to compel Samsung to answer certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Lucas v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Milner v. National School of Health TechnologyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Superior Coal Co. v. Ruhrkohle A.G.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shamis Ex Rel. Wishbone Trading Co. v. Ambassador Factors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
  3. Kramer v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  4. Brown v. IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
  5. Jochims v. Isuzu Motors, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API