Legal Opinion
Shamis Ex Rel. Wishbone Trading Co. v. Ambassador Factors Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 27, 1999No. 95 Civ. 9818(RWS)PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Ambassador Factors Corporation (“Ambassador”), defendants S. Roberts, Inc. (“Roberts”), Christy Lynn, Inc. (“Christy”), Angela Christy, Inc. (“Angela”), Jay Vee, Inc. (“Jay Vee”) and Nathan L. Korman (“Korman” and collectively “The Roberts Defendants”) and defendant Maho-ney Cohen Rashba Pokart and Company (“Mahoney Cohen”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss this action, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, based on plaintiff Robert Shamis’ (“Shamis”) alleged discovery abuses, or, in the alternative, for sanctions.
The Roberts Defendants,…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Goodman v. Praxair Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Shamis v. Ambassador Factors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Successor in Interest to New England Merchants Leasing Corporation, Etc. v. Ogden CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Strougo v. Bea AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.