Legal Opinion
Superior Coal Co. v. Ruhrkohle A.G.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 14, 1979No. Civ. A. No. 78-51PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
Twenty-one anthracite coal and coke producers in Schuylkill, Luzerne and Dauphin Counties, Pennsylvania, instituted this action under Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26, and Section 801 of the Antidumping Act of 1916, 15 U.S.C. § 72, for numerous antitrust and anti-dumping violations.1 Defendants include seven West German and four American corporations which influence the coal and coke industries in varied ways. Ruhrkohle, A.G., a West German corporation, mines, produces, processes and sells coal, coke and by-products for…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Max Daetwyler Corp., a New York Corporation v. R. Meyer, a West German Corporation. Appeal of Rolf MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In re Arthur Treacher's Franchisee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Max Daetwyler Corp. v. MeyerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- McClain v. Mack Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.