Ross v. Board of Education
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. E. P. Mogan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
In this proceeding the plaintiff was awarded a peremptory writ of mandate, commanding and compelling the defendants, in their official capacity as members of the board of education of the city and county of San Francisco, to approve his demand upon the common school fund of the school district of said city and county in the sum of $100, which it was alleged was the balance due him for salary under a previously existing contract, whereby the plaintiff was employed by the defendants as storekeeper for said board of education. In the court below the defendants interposed a general demurrer to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Babcock v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Fremont v. CrippenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Stone v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Goddard v. South Bay Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Personnel CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Saxton v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.