Legal Opinion
D'LIL v. Best Western Encina Lodge & Suites
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 12, 2008No. 06-55516PublishedCited by 237 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RYMER.
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether Hollynn D’Lil has standing to seek attorney’s fees in an action brought against the Best Western Enema Lodge & Suites (“Best Western Enci-na”) under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq., and California civil rights laws. We conclude that she does.
*1034I. Background
Hollynn D’Lil is a paraplegic who requires the use of a wheelchair for mobility. On December 13, 2001, D’Lil traveled from her home in Sacramento to Santa Barbara,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by237 opinions
- Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Coto Settlement v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- State of Missouri v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Scherr v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.