Legal Opinion
Moeller v. Taco Bell Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 5, 2011No. C 02-5849 PJHPublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The case was filed as a proposed class action case under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”), the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ.Code § 51 et seq. (“Unruh Act”), and the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ.Code § 54 et seq. (“CDPA”).
Plaintiffs are physically disabled California residents who use electric scooters or wheelchairs as their primary means of mobility. Plaintiffs filed this action on December 17, 2002, against defendant Taco Bell Corp. (“TBC”), alleging…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Vogel v. Rite Aid Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Daniel Lopez v. Catalina Channel Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Clemons v. DartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Freeman v. ABC Legal Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.