Legal Opinion
Jesse Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 12, 2012No. 11-56600PublishedCited by 194 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on October 12, 2012, and appearing at 696 F.3d 943, is amended as follows:
On page 12258 of the slip opinion, replace the final two sentences of the third paragraph with the following language:
Pursuant to the FCC ruling, prior express consent is consent to call a particular telephone number in connection with a particular debt that is given before the call in question is placed. Id. at 564-65. PRA did not show a single instance where express consent was given before the call was placed. Id. at 565.
An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- Al Otro Lado v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Bradley Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Los Angeles Lakers, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Muhammed Abdullah v. U.S. Security Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Jordan Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.