Morrison v. Stone
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This action was brought by Morrison, a stockholder in the History Company, a corporation, on behalf of himself and of all other stockholders in said corporation who should join him in the action, against N. J. Stone, J. L. Hebert, Elizabeth C. Latham, administratrix of the estate of A. S. Latham, and said History Company.
The complaint charges a conspiracy between Stone, Hebert, and Latham, all of whom were connected with said History Company (Stone being vice-president), to injure that corporation, by organizing another, known as the Pacific Publishing Company, and that after the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Warring v. FreearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Diefendorff v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bacon v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Goldman v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hoyt v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Blochman v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Imperial Water Co. No. 1 v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Weichers v. DehailCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.