Legal Opinion
Imperial Water Co. No. 1 v. Imperial Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 1923No. Civ. No. 4171PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
On the sixth day of July, 1917, Imperial Laguna Water Company entered into a contract with the United States Government with respect to the diversion and use of water from and of the Colorado River. By the terms of the contract, under certain conditions therein specified, the United States government had the right to cancel the contract. However, without a formal cancellation of that contract, on October 23, 1918, the United States government entered into another contract with a different company— the Imperial Irrigation District—-covering practically the same subject matter as did the former…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Southern Pac. R.R. v. DufourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gore v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Strauch v. BielohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Minor v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Pellegrino v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.