Weichers v. Dehail
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Daniel C. Deasy, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in his favor for damages in the sum of one dollar in a suit in which trial by jury was waived, upon a cause of action of the lessee of a portion of a building in San Francisco, for hotel purposes, for breach of an express covenant of the lease and of claimed implied covenants. The record is voluminous, and since the judgment must be sustained, no purpose will be served by an extended recital of facts. It is enough to say that since the lease was for hotel purposes, the appellant claims there was an implied covenant that the heating and hot-water plants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bliss v. SneathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Parke v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Blochman v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Tuttle v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Morrison v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hahn v. WildeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Rocky Mountain Fire Insurance v. BelcherMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Weaver v. Atlantian Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bostock v. HulseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942