Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Irvine

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1886No. 9367PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

This is an appeal from a judgment of non-suit and an order denying a new trial.

The plaintiffs, Henry D. Bacon and others, stockholders of the Morgan Mining Company; instituted an action in equity against that company, its president, Charles T. Botts, its treasurer, William Irvine, its superintendent, Robert Irvine, John Douglass, an employee, and James H. Wallace, Joseph M. Maguire, Robért Dixon, and T. K. Wilson, directors of said corporation. The purpose had in view by the plaintiffs in bringing their suit appears from the complaint to have been to procure the appointment of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loftus v. Farmers' Shipping Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Morrison v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Averill v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Averill v. BarberNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API