Goldman v. Rogers
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover possession of two lots of land in the town of Tulare, the complaint being in the ordinary form in ejectment. The. defendant, by her answer, denied all the averments of the complaint, and then, by way of cross-complaint, set up that she purchased the lots on the twenty-fifth day of July, 1882, and received a good and sufficient bargain and sale deed thereof, in her own name, which was afterwards recorded, and that she “ paid therefor money owned by her in her own exclusive right”; that ever since the date of her purchase she had been…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hoyt v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Morrison v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Payson Building & Loan Soc. v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1935