Legal Opinion

Adams v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 23, 1960No. 455PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmah, J.

It is not necessary to determine whether, as defendant Bank argues, it, as mortgage creditor, had merely a lien on the monies which the Highway Commission was required to pay, Liverman v. R. R., 109 N.C. 52; or, as mortgage creditor, it was required to apply the monies so paid to reduce the debt secured by the mortgage, Bonner v. Styron, 113 N.C. 30. It is sufficient for the purpose of this appeal to note that the judgment fixing the compensation required the application of that sum to plaintiff’s debt. The trustee, representing the Bank as mortgage creditor, was a party to that proceeding.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. BondIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Power Co. v. . Clay CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Stone Co. v. RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Liverman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Whitehead v. . MorrillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Bulk Sale of the Inventory, Furniture, Fixtures, Vehicles, & All Other Assets of Hart's Transfer & Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  2. Weinstein v. Park Funding Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Grimes v. Sea & Sky Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API