Stone Co. v. Rich
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from O. U. Allen., J., at February Term, 1912, of SampsoN. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Justice Walker.
1Opinion of the Court
"Walker, J.
Tbis case was before us at a former term, under tbe title of Stone Co. v. McLamb & Co., A. D. Rich, and others, 153 N. C., 378. "We tben beld tbat Mrs. M. M. Yann, a feme covert, was liable for tbe debts of tbe firm of McLamb & Go., under tbe statute, Eevisal, sec. 2118, and tbat tbe order appointing a receiver of tbe partnership effects was erroneous and should be vacated, and tbe property, which was under mortgagee to A. D. Eicb, should be restored to him. Tbe ease was remanded for tbe settlement of tbe other matters involved. Tbe parties thereupon agreed tbat an issue be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lester v. . HoustonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Pearce v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Jos. W. Jenkins & Co. v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Vick v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Long v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- F. M. Slagle & Co. v. BushnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Preston County Coke Co. v. Preston County Light & Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Power Co. v. . Clay CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Lowery v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Bryant v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.