Weinstein v. Park Funding Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TAUBMAN.
Defendant, Park Funding Corp. (Park Funding), appeals the judgment entered pursuant to C.R.C.P. 54(b) in favor of plaintiffs, Lee H. Weinstein, Peter Brown, David Brown, and Adam Brown (collectively Wein-stein). Specifically, Park Funding appeals the trial court’s ruling that Weinstein was entitled to allocate the proceeds from a foreclosure sale solely to the non-recourse portion of the indebtedness secured by a deed of trust. It also appeals the trial court’s award of taxes in addition to the deficiency, the inclusion of a defaulted payment as accrued and unpaid…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lipscomb v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Obert v. Colorado Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- First National City Bank v. KlineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Cary v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. A. Enkema Holding Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vantage Investments, Inc. v. Loc Nguyen Corp. (In Re Vantage Investments, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2008
- Bryan v. Clark (In Re Bryan)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- City Partnership Co. v. IR-TCI Partners V, L.P.District Court, D. Colorado · 2003